I felt like a spy for the other side

Tuesday, 29 September 2009 09:21

I was at the Labour Party conference in Brighton on Sunday at what they call a "fringe" event, run by the Urban Hub, called "Tomorrow's City Economies:  where will the new jobs come from?"

I'm always amazed at how our MP's want to spend our money, sometimes not even realising that what they are calling for already exists. "We should have a new 3i." Actually, that exists; it's called NESTA, and is run very well by Jonathan Kestenbaum. "We should have an innovations group for market failures." Actually, that exists; it's called the Technology Strategy Board, and they have £1bn of our money, and do a fantastic job deploying it. "Government should work with students to help them become entrepreneurs." Actually they are doing it already; it's called NACUE, it's self-organising and 25,000 strong.

After I spoke, I was called elitist and told I couldn't be talking about the poor. I must hang out only with the well-to-do internet entrepreneurs.

Actually, many of the entrepreneurs I've backed don't have any formal education. The Fredericks Foundation, of which I'm a huge fan, is run by a leading entrepreneur and backs those people at the bottom of society, giving them micro-loans to get them back on track as micro-entrepreneurs, moving them from a cost to society to a taxable source of revenue.

The more we argue for our limitations, the more we are limited by them. If government were forced to downsize, the vacuum created would be filled by volunteers, community groups, private business, religious groups, student organisations and individuals.

We have a choice: do we want to have the richest poor people in the world? Or do we want to encourage greatness in those poor people, and know that some people, by dint of their natural smarts, hard work, mentors and good luck, will overcome tremendous odds to make huge contributions and become successful. The world is full of opportunity.

I believe that the economic growth that we are starting to feel will be led by entrepreneurs. They are the engine of society and they drive our collective revenue line. We must not burden them with so much tax and bureaucracy that they slow down, or so much cost that regardless of how much revenue they create, there is always more cost than revenue, leaving us perpetually in the red.

The more we encourage people to believe that the government will sort out their problems and all problems, the more feudal a society we become. We have a choice at the election: do we believe in our own abilities, and are we accountable for ourselves? Will we help others believe and accept accountability too? I know which side of history I want to be on.

 

Julie Meyer is CEO of Ariadne Capital.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP

Comments (3)

Intelligence is more important than size
John King
Hi Julie,

I didn't see you at the Urban Hub event but I know that the organisers, Centre for Cities, have a reputation for stimulating debate, rather than telling parties what they want to hear - it sounds like you gave them exactly what they wanted!

I think your argument is weakened, however, by the fact that two of the three organisations you mention are publicly funded, and the CEO of the third formerly ran an organisation bootstrapped by the public sector.

I think we need to move the debate on from the old public sector too big / too small argument. What matters is intelligent investment. If public sector money can help generate individuals with the vision and drive of NACUE's Victoria Lennox - whose organisation will repay any public investment one hundred fold in eventual tax returns - we need more of it.

On the other hand, sometimes the public sector can be like a friendly elephant. It can kill you without even noticing. It needs to know when to grow and when to shrink - not dependent on which party is in charge, but on what is best for the situation; when public seed money will generate returns to the exchequer, and when it is squashing competition.

PS Love your blog - good to hear an entrepreneur putting her mouth where her money is smilies/smiley.gif
John King , September 29, 2009
Centre for Cities
Dermot Finch
Hi Julie -

Thanks for taking part in our Urban Hub debate - your first fringe event! Hope it didn't freak you out too much. I was really pleased you could join us on the panel, and liked your "real entrepreneur" perspective. Would be great to include you in another one of our events some time.

Here's my blog on the event - I focused on the comments about Regional Development Agencies - http://centreforcities.typepad...-rdas.html

PS will check out the Fredericks Foundation - sounds good

Oh, and thanks John for the plug!

All the best, Dermot
Dermot Finch , September 30, 2009
A spy for the other side?..what other side? Labour or Consevative? they're both the same to me!
seanys
There will be no new significant job creation in the private sector for a while. Western governments will ultimately have to down size resulting more unemployment or continue to print money to hold back economic depression. Assuming that the private sector will suckup market share from the public sector is far fetched. What is in question is genuine end user demand, period! Economic depressions are a necessary component of capitalism, and infact realists like me actually look forward to such regressionary events as it is crystal clear that nothing has really changed from a macro social economic standpoint.

Look back to the Roman Empire, The British Empire and now the American global footprint ; These three vehicles were designed to secure resources for the few at the expense of the majority. The only difference now is that these resource sucking vehicles no longer have any idea what their ultimate goals are due to the effects of globalisation, enhanced by improved communication technology now available to more and more people. Gone are the days of governments abilities to create distractions in foreign territories by starting wars in a view to enhance percieved value back home.

Isn't it obvious, that if the banks are unwilling to lend to the SME sector even though they have recapitalised off the back of direct tax payer cash injections, that private equity investors would be crazy to put their money or their wealth on the line! This is not the time to bet against the trend! This certainly not the time to be brave!

So what has changed?...nothing really, what you should be asking is what is changing? Well, here's my take, historically 20 percent have held 80 percent of the world resources and wealth, this 20 : 80 phenomenon is rupturing at an ever increasing rate. Global money / wealth flow is accelerating at a rate where it is now unstoppable. No governement market manipulation / intervention can stop this bleed from rupturing, that is unless we have another world war!

How can entrepreneurs, businessmen and business women benefit? Investing in businesses located in western economies, such as Europe, The UK and even the USA would be a bad move simply due to the fact that these economies are sustained on the dependency of artificial reflationary moves by their governments, now this money printing cannot go on forever as this ME policy can only cause huge dilutions to all asset valuations, besides this, taxes and levels of red tape have to rise to pay for the ever increasing extended government debt....this is clear to see in currency markets...the US Dollar is set to ultimately collapse, the GB Pound will also buckle in the process...holders of US treasuries will liquidate their holdings as the US will be technically bankrupt as a result of being unable to pay the interest to its debt holders without printing more money...its a vicious carousel, but thats how capitalism works!...So where's the upside in all of this doom?...

Well like I said nothings really changed for centuries when you look at it from a macro social standpoint, human nature has not changed one bit!, it certainly won't be the end of the world if the US dollar collapses as capitalists will move on to greener pastures...This upside will be the real asset grab...Sell all western governments bonds and buy exposure to commodities such as GOLD, OIL, The INDUSTRIAL METALS; Food prices are set to soar, buy all soft commodities... I certainly wouldn't buy private equity as it is so illiquid. The current economic environment presents too much risk, poor private equity investments are likely to be put to sleep by government red tape.

It is more important now than ever before for individuals along with business people to take direct control of thier financial destiny. You can't rely on your governments...whether its Labour or Conservative makes really no difference as when you dig deep enough you realise that they are the same but with different name badges. It's not sensible to get caught up in political drivel. I'd rather live under the leadership of President Barrack Obama who seems more grounded than any other political leader in the world today.

Globalised Capitalism is the real movement in play, the middle classes are nearly extinct!,....this 20 : 80 ratio is breaking down not in the favour of Europe, the UK or the USA!......don't wait for change, make a change now....its time to cash in!
seanys , October 03, 2009

Write comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Login

Top 10 Reasons to Join Entrepreneur Country

  1. Make connections with a population of like-minded individuals
  2. News, Views and Issues straight to your inbox fortnightly
  3. Win tickets to the bi-annual Entrepreneur Country forum
  4. Have your say in forums and comment on articles and blogs
  5. Exclusive money- and time-saving offers from our partners
  6. You can be in another country without leaving your desk
  7. No visa/retinal scans/fingerprinting required
  8. No nasty travel vaccinations required
  9. No jet lag
  10. Nobody will 'poke' you like they do on Facebook